Since almost nobody answered my question of his/her idea about the importance of considering the universe in which we are living to be objective or subjective, I am not planning to go into the details. However, just to clarify my viewpoint on this particular subject I’ll go briefly through it.
Taking the Daemon as a way to explain the possibility of existence of an omnipotent god can be easily falsified by its consecutive paradoxes. However, the question of the universe being a simulation of a computational device with limited power is yet to be addressed.
It is indeed a defining assumption both in philosophy and science. The philosophical arguments are way easier in this sense, so I just bring two scientific examples to show the difference:
This one contains a little bit of philosophy too. The question is whether the computer which is simulating our virtual reality is a deterministic computational machine or a probabilistic one? This is important, because we have free will only if the computer is probabilistic!
The second question is this: Are the laws of nature subject to change? Roughly speaking, our presumption is that the laws of nature are constant and we are making our laws of physical sciences more accurate to get closer and closer to the natural laws. If the laws of nature are subject to slight changes, what would be the new definition of the incompleteness of the science.
Hundreds of other scientific and philosophical questions could be asked. However, the greatest dilemma is whether we can have access to the daemon’s mind or not.


